為了大選併公投舉行，應採一階段或兩階段領、投票，綠、藍高層要角都成了「罵戰部隊」，全部出動開罵，互嗆罵戰連天不休。
這兩天罵戰升高，前天藍軍台北市長郝龍斌嗆扁，陳總統若堅持一階段領票，就不發給他選票，阿扁總統昨天強力回嗆，好膽就不要給我領票，我就是要守法領票！
阿扁批郝，台北市獨立了嗎？郝市府回批，中央要戒嚴嗎？謝長廷嗆郝對抗中央，破壞體制，教壞囝仔大小，副總統呂秀蓮嗆國民黨，執政縣市搞諸侯割據；馬英九則批民進黨政府，中央又不是黑道，不應以「退休金不保」恐嚇。
以上只是罵戰局部，罵戰還多的很，從中央到地方的罵戰中，最離譜的莫過於郝龍斌罵民進黨政府，執意採一階段，「選務亂了，就可宣布戒嚴」。
什麼時代了，誰敢走國民黨老路戒嚴？誰能像國民黨當年那樣，製造亂局做為藉口，實施戒嚴獨裁統治？
這應去問國民黨，國民黨曾在台灣戒嚴近四十年，戒嚴經驗之豐富，簡直「罄竹難書」，馬英九、郝龍斌等都出身戒嚴權貴世家，應該最清楚怎麼搞戒嚴。
台灣人民不懂也絕不接受戒嚴統治，要反問國民黨的是，亂則戒嚴說法，是否表示國民黨期待「天下大亂，形勢大好」？
藍綠要角如此赤搏上陣，火辣開罵，有如政治版「色．戒」，政局如因而大亂，屆時選務不亂也難，亂，是一項警言，藍綠都必須「亂．戒」，以亂為戒、戒之在亂！
執政黨硬起來
執政黨負擔政策執行的成敗責任
若反對黨執政之地方政府不執行全國性之工作
屆時造成國家混亂的後果就不全然是執政黨的責任
這個道理人人都懂 只有惡劣傳媒假裝不懂 還為虎作倀 欺騙人民
2004陳總統選假的啊
不能二階段投票 2004陳總統選假的啊
只有自己可以作 別人不行 搞獨裁嗎
這些亂台的支那國匪民黨就是沒有民主素養
2004中央選委會規定的,跟阿扁總統何干?
這次中選會這麼規定,不去配合,倒罵甚麼專制獨裁?
那是你們這批擋民主的支那封建餘孽
對台灣民主一點也沒貢獻的匪黨
還想選
下級對抗上級? 一點行政倫理都沒有
回去支那啦
別在台灣丟臉
牧師證道：「政治」短視扁 一臉嚴肅
記者李濠仲/台北報導
祈禱早餐會 首次不公開
陳水扁總統上午參加國家祈禱早餐會，主辦單位首次以不公開形式舉行，寇紹恩牧師在證道時說，我們必須承認，台灣有一個很嚴重的問題，就是短視，什麼都操作短線，想要馬上得到效果，媒體贏得收視率再說；教育只重考試；企業界賺了再說，政治恐怕也是這樣，為了選票，無所不用其極，先贏了再說，「飲鴆止渴」，是最可悲的短視。
寇紹恩表示，今天的主題是「耶穌愛台灣」，「愛台灣」是今天最流行的一句話，但每個人都站在自己的立場愛台灣，這種從自我出發的愛，難免把事情愈弄愈複雜，甚至愈來愈對立，這不是愛的本意，卻是愛的結果。
寇紹恩說，台灣需要一個有遠見的眼界，不只是眼前的、短視的愛台灣，要用耶穌「常存的愛」愛台灣，否則飲鴆止渴，連毒藥都可能喝。
阿扁快戒嚴吧!
中選會是綠的, 政府局處長是綠的, 規則是你說了算, 兩階段投票有不准別人領公投票嗎? 沒有...2004就是兩階段, 所以, 民進黨政府的背後目的昭然若揭, 鬼話新聞又再恐嚇大家, 哈, 阿扁你就直接宣佈戒嚴吧! 所有選舉凍結! 你自任為台灣國首任總統, 豈不快哉!? 不過後果會是...所以, 民進黨不敢, 我就是看衰你們這群文盲!
你有沒有綠了臉呢?不要生氣，生氣是看別人的錯誤來處罰自己，何況誰對誰錯都還沒有定論呢?現在台灣很不錯嗎?不管支不支持，每個人都可以嗆總統，去中國嗆溫家寶看看?以前的蔣大帥就更不用說了，不分藍綠，芋頭還是番薯，隔天就不見的一籮筐!現在台灣真好!但是能好多久?享受一下吧!想看看，不要隨便就被騙了!
支那殖民遺孽,不只腦殘又兼色盲囉
甚麼都是綠的?
其實謝匪長廷也不比"恬不知恥"的恐嚇台灣人一定要投它!
竟然不知道國匪黨是怎麼形容它的?
搞不好立委選後,出現一位立場堅定的台灣派,那時候誰會要你這種半奸忠的台奸候選人?
等著看吧
台灣人才濟濟,不必選這種半奸忠的台奸,沒有任何政見,沒有任何願景,一天到晚只會恐嚇台灣人,威脅台灣人,煩
貪扁是腦殘還是皇帝
既然不是阿扁管 投票動線規畫屬於地方政府權限，根本不是陳總統要管的事情，既然不是阿扁管也不必恫嚇威脅
陳水扁總統提出選舉無效說，倘若二階段領投票就是選舉無效，2004年大選也是採二階段領投票，阿扁豈不是當選無效？
DPP只會搞破壞
DPP和阿扁看來是中共臥底搞破壞臺灣的
快滾回大陸去
支那權貴遺孽,甚麼是動線由地方管?
別馬不知臉長
請依一階段排桌椅,掃地,排茶水,到垃圾!
貪扁? 坐擁一兆五千億掠奪自台灣人民的不正黨產,罵別人貪?
你們kmt的貪才出名,連ROC都貪掉囉
台灣始終不是ROC的領土,去看一下你們的憲法吧
你們不會贏,連在台灣立尾椎之地的台灣人民也唾棄你們
請回去吧 KMT丟臉又下賤的舉動 讓人笑話
跟那些民進黨破黨工一樣,或許都回去支那吧
K 黨不會贏,謝 也不會贏,那誰會贏？是好笑先生贏嗎？
看這久的 好笑 廻響,還是不懂？
你想知道嗎?
等著看吧
怎麼？不方便說？故弄玄虛!!
你不會到處走走就知道囉
看阿扁選舉與謝的選舉氣氛
不研究想知道?
哈哈哈
報給你知
民進黨擅長的選舉晚會造勢，今年有「失靈」現象。單一選票小選區經營，深耕基層勝過晚會，黨主席陳水扁的「守護台灣助選團」從上周開始測試動員力，因為黨中央沒有補助，結果連續幾場下來，都是台上天王「燒滾滾」，台下群眾「冷吱吱」 黨政高層指出，陳總統預計在一月中之前，要把七十三個選區全掃一遍，測試地方幹部的動員力，因此日前開始，周一「小考」，在黨中央不補助車馬費的情況下，看一周內，大家能動員多少人。若達不到目標，就用力檢討，各縣市黨部及參選人，都「剉勒等」。民主夜市 卻越來越沒落，陳水扁擅長操作的造勢活動，今年顯然盛況不再。以昨晚台中市造勢晚會為例，因為改為小選區後，深耕基層勝過舉辦大型晚會，昨晚的動員，立委還需靠市議員幫忙，動員Ａ級（死忠）支持者，才撐起四千多人的場面。不過黨政人士不諱言：「討黨產和民眾，真的關係不大，根本激不起熱情。」選戰激不起火花，因此造勢晚會常常出現，台上天王說的慷慨激昂、口沫橫飛，台下民眾反應冷淡。
謝贏不了已是定數!你說馬也不會贏,
那~~又回到原點~好笑贏嗎？奇怪咧!!
絕對權力帶來絕對腐敗
只要有人說DPP 不好
DPP說法就是跟KMT比爛
人民選舉只能比爛 那就一直政黨輪替下去 才有得比
KMT至少創造經濟奇蹟
DPP執政讓我覺得像是中共臥底搞爛臺灣
叫抱怨的人民跳海到中國是鼓勵人民往大陸跑嗎
只能歌功頌德而不能批評叫什麼民主自由
馬英九可能沒有智慧，可能魄力也不夠
但是我會投他一票是因為他守法、因為他是一個好人。不會像啊扁一樣到處亂咬。這一點就夠了。臺灣不需要更多權謀的政治人物，只欠好人。
陳水扁和他的扁激支援者, 再說什麼也無濟於事, 對這種人, 也不需在此造口業 -- 沒的髒了自己, 何苦!!
絕對權力帶來絕對腐敗 政黨輪替吧
這根本不是二選一的問題
只要一個能串起台灣民心的人,信用度夠,登高一呼
就解決囉
支那殖民者的黨奴
還在叫春
連當忠誠反對黨都不會
這幾年牠們造的孽
想輪替甚麼
一點民主概念都沒有
什麼好人？是好娘!!中國就是喜歡『好人又好娘的馬英九』
快請他~馬的~去中國當國家副主席!
在台灣選舉多辛苦,明明是個高貴的外省權貴,偏偏穿個汗杉裝普羅!
搞個『攏是假』只住一夜!拿著豬飼料說好吃!真是『好』作做!!
支那殖民黨奴
上次軍購的公投
是不成立
而不是不通過
知道嗎?
你們這群kmt叛國賊
憑甚麼擋軍購?
你們憑甚麼不顧台灣人民全體利益
凍結政府預算
還推個涉嫌貪污的選總統
全地球人都想笑
剛才去中央社逛了一下
台灣學者 楊開煌?
看牠的發言 一頭霧水
原來是福建福州人!
這批支那權貴到底活在那個虛擬空間
自我陶醉
阿扁乾脆廢國號,自立為皇帝好了,以後什麼也不用選...我想好笑可入宮為第一太監.
楊開煌本就是急統派,常常打著台灣學者招牌,在中國吃香喝辣
轉載
真是天佑台灣啊！這塊寶島福地，能夠透過民主選舉產生總統，也能操弄民粹，產生第一個「台灣人皇帝」了。
民主憲政的基本，就是憲法與法律應是「保障」人民，法令沒有規定的，人民都可以作；法令沒有允許的，政府統統不能去作。人民享有最大權限的「自由」，政府這頭權力怪獸，則要受到最大的「約束」。偏偏在「偉大」的陳水扁統治之下，「諸法皆空，自由自在」的竟是總統與執政者，處處受制，事事被管的，竟是人民百姓、基層自治組織（如縣市政府），台灣，不是即將變成「帝制」，還能是什麼制？
看看最近政府的嘴臉吧！稍稍反對政府，發點異聲的，馬上被打成是「造反」一族（請參考陳水扁的電子報之文字），政府沒砍沒殺，被視為是「寬宏大量」，差一點就要講是「皇恩浩蕩」了吧！
-----------------------------------------------------
可笑的小太監們應該高興要進宮了吧
轉載
「皇權」無遠弗屆，當然是「政教合一」了，所以，當曹興誠發表異聲，「偉大、尊貴、不容侵犯」的陳水扁，自自然然化身是「乩童」了，馬上「代傳神喻」，指責曹興誠，「連媽祖都不會原諒」！真是「君權神授」的活靈活現啊！再看看憲法第十章：「中央與地方是均權關係」；再翻翻「地方制度法」，選舉是地方自治事項，是縣市政府天賦權限與法定職權；再上網查查陳水扁的歷年「嘉言錄」：中央與地方是『夥伴關係』。
這些根本都不重要了，只要「扁大帝」心意改變，可以威脅「退休金會泡湯」、可以取代法院，說這是「一國兩制」就是「一國兩制」，說是「選舉無效」就是「選舉無效」，陳水扁怎能還是「區區小總統」，當然該稱為是「陳水扁大帝」才符合他至高無上的威權。更要感謝陳水扁與民進黨，還可以大搞「指鹿為馬」等荒誕戲。到21世紀的台灣，陳水扁說是鹿，多少民進黨的打手，馬上會變出梅花鹿、長頸鹿‧‧‧「循鹿」滿地爬呢？
2008，台灣已經到了一個不再是「政黨是否要輪替？」之爭了，台灣，正面臨的是「國體保衛之爭」了，民主國、還是帝制國？一線之間。
台灣，還是「民主」國度嗎？
-----------------------------------------------------
好笑的弄臣們應該高興要封官了吧
支那殖民權貴的黨奴
你們不會失去權利就發顛吧
你們說的
根本是你們自己
政治搖頭丸喀的還不輕
民進黨滾到太平洋去, 沒加蓋喔!
轉貼自UDN..
陳水扁在當台北市長時曾說中央應該尊重地方，
怎麼現在為了要作票而不尊重地方??
例：
1994.12.04(當選市長)：台北市事事看中央眼色的做法將成為歷史。
1995.07.26(市長任內)：市府無意與中央爭權，但為了落實地方自治精神，
促進行政效率及便民福祉，地方政府的自主空間應擴大。
1999.12.23(競選總統)：如果民進黨贏得二千年總統大選，一定會做到100%
地方自治。
2001.12.17(總統任內)：地方與中央是夥伴關係，中央應打破集權集錢的心態。
(可任意轉貼，無侵權問題)
這次選舉應該謝謝"郝軍閥的助選團"
台灣人會傾巢而出
讓台灣人當選
謝謝 銘謝賜票
中國國民黨本是小偷強盜,偷盜台灣的政權及財產,郝馬都是強盜集團頭頭的後代, 或放狠話,或裝的和顏悅色,但都是在行狠事
Senseless - 1
The new one-step voting system - easier, more efficient, and privacy guaranteed - is a step closer to the one-ballot, one-step voting system that all the matured democratic countries adopted. All those who are currently fighting against this much improved voting system are (1) backward-minded and therefore cannot tolerate the change, or (2) mentally challenged and therefore cannot see the benefit of the newer system, or (3) self-serving that they would destroy our hard-earned democracy to protect their own gains and the KMT, an ancient political party that refuses to progress and reform.
Senseless - 2
The Central Election Commission made a decision, to pan-blue’s favor, to employ a two-step system in 2004 for the presidential election. The final ruling was followed throughout all local governments without any resistance from pan-green. Four years later, having evaluated the results from the prior election, the CEC proposed a new and improved voting procedure, the two-ballot, one-step system, an enhancement that should have received overwhelm supports by all parties and all Taiwanese people. But look who’s playing foul and crying wolf?
Senseless - 3
The CEC is an independent commission, overseeing the national-level elections (including legislative, presidential, and referendum), setting the standard voting policy and procedure for all local governments and all registered voters to follow. There can only be one-set of voting system - the CEC’s standards. The election rules are so clearly documented that any person with average IQ would just understand once shown the rules.
It’s the CEC that sets the election policy and the local governments merely provide resources and help carry out the standardized procedure. 郝龍斌 and other pan-blue mayors purposely misquote the election rule to mislead their supporters. Unfortunately, there are those who lack independent thinking ability and those who deliberately want to create chaos to undermine Taiwanese’s rights to vote for referendum. To 馬英九, 郝龍斌, who are Western educated, I say, “Shame on you. You have not learned the true meaning of democracy.” To KMT and its senseless and helplessly brainwashed followers, I say, “Stay out of the way because the great Taiwanese people are charging forward for a better way of doing things and a brighter tomorrow.”
不重要啦
因為他們已經是欺人太甚
一定拉倒
Shameless DPP governmnet
DPP government is enforcing all resources legal or illigal just to cover their candidates. In fact, they are wasting peoples' money on their own benefit. How dare they say it is a "Promotion of Policy". UN for Taiwan? Even if the referendum is passed, it's still impossible to join UN. Come! Declare the martial law! Let's see who would be the final victor of the election. DPP losers will probably swim to endless Pacific crying for help. Yes. It will serve them right.
不想投公投
不是幾階段的問題,而是選務安排須符合公投法的精神。
公投法規定公投要成案需1/2有投票權人領票,意思是即使你對公投案的陳述沒意見(目前公投案的陳述誰會有意見?)但你對該公投案覺得無聊就不要去領票公投案就不會過。二階段領票才能讓"賭爛"的民意變得有價值
看你們阿扁豎仔樣,看來又要重演上次縣市長選舉,綠軍慘敗的情境,
大嘴扁鬧吧,大話多說點吧,
馬英九屆時可以頒獎給阿扁,題上
助選功臣,
惠我多多
2004陳總統選假的啊
我記得2004公投案沒過
陳總統還說總統可不選 公投案不可不過
結果公投案沒過 陳總統選上了
大家都心知肚明 公投案是選舉操作
跟愛臺灣畫等號 根本是唬人
愛臺灣的執政黨應該致力民生經濟問題而非拼政治
因為陳水扁也說過選舉以後甚麼也不會發生
也有不想投公投的選民 一階段選舉逼迫不想公投的選民二選一
選民希望政治人物回歸民生經濟問題
UN for Taiwan - Of course it's a national agenda
Becoming a UN member and participating in the worldly activities have long been the dream of the Taiwanese people. The current and many prior administrations, KMT government included, have been campaigning “UN for ROC” year after year like a ritual. Of course it is and has been a promotion of national policy. The sad truth is: you and I all know too well that using ROC as a ticket to “Return to UN” or to “Join UN” is an impossible task. Continue doing so would be deceiving and costly. The more practical way is to use the name “Taiwan”, an internationally recognized name, and enter UN as a new member. With China bulling us around, squeezing our breezing space from outside, and KMT cooperating with and surrendering to PRC from inside, there is a national identity crisis. We need to accelerate our promotion of national identity and voice our desire to become a contributing UN member to the international community, the louder the better. It will be a powerful force that cannot be denied when the 23 million Taiwanese are all united and scream for international support. It’s not going to be easy, but it is an attainable goal as long as we have the people and the international community on our side.
UN for Taiwan - Of course it's a national agenda -2
You guys really need to learn to face the truth gracefully – the ROC as you know it has long gone, vanished, wiped-out, done with; it has ceased to exist since 1947. You either join the mainstream as a proud Taiwanese or go back to where you belong to be a pure Chinese. Maybe you can contribute more and be happier over there.
For those who still murmuring about 2004, I give up on you.
To VICKI
我爸媽不懂英文 只想選總統不想投公投
他們看譕公投在搞什麼 不投公投只選總統擔心成廢票
Did CEC mean Central Election committee? However it is controlled by DPP now. If you let the vote of "Taiwan for UN" passed ,so what? Howeve our Presedent Chen had said " no thing will happen after election" Besides, it should reconized internationally or just for UN.
Don't forget China had the right to reject your admission for UN. So if ROC for UN is impossible, how would you think Taiwan for UN is possible?
PS:我想你可能在國外 但我也在國外 也是可以轉成繁體中文
Free Campaigning
Per 好笑:
這次選舉應該謝謝"郝軍閥的助選團"
台灣人會傾巢而出
讓台灣人當選
I couldn't agree with you more. Unlike Airborne, the pan-green will be as humble and as tolerant with the sour losers one more time.
回歸民生經濟問題
They are the same thinking pathway in politics.
They both want more than now
"Taiwan wants to be independent country " and " China wants to be a strong country including Taiwan"
However, the truth is only one left in the future.
My point is that if Taiwan is induldged in politics conflict but not promotion in economic affairs, it will loose its strength for survival in the world. Then there will be the truth left "" China is a strong country including Taiwan" Do you want to see it happen?
However, DPP is doing on the way.
請停止政爭 回歸民生經濟問題 別讓臺灣向下沉淪
這些年我對DPP執政能力實在失望
PS : Vicki , did you vote 2004 election? Did you remember the topic of 公投? Is anything happened after the election except President Chen? SO I sais public vote is the tricky for election.
Dear 麻煩你寫繁體中文 -1
他們看譕公投在搞什麼 – AGAIN, IT’S CENTRAL ELECTION COMMISSION’S (CEC) RESPONSIBILTY TO EDUCATE THE VOTERS ON THE VOTING PROCESS DOWN TO EVERY LITTLE DETAILS, MAKING SURE EVEN ELDERLY A-KUN AND A-MA KNOW THE “WHAT” AND THE “HOW”. AS A YOUNGER GENEARATION, YOU ALSO CAN AND SHOULD TRY TO EXPLAIIN THE DEFINITION AND IMPACT OF EACH REFERENDUM SO THEY CAN MAKE THE RIGHT CHOICE. BUT FIRST, YOU SHOULD LEARN THE FIRST HAND INFORMATION DIRECTLY FROM CED WHICH IS NOT BIASED OR DISTORTED. AFTER ALL, IT’S AN ELECTION THAT COULD VERY WELL DECIDE THE FATE OF THE TAIWANESE AND THEIR FUTURE OFFSPRINGS; IT SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN LIGHTLY. I AM SURE CEC WILL START THE EDUCATION/DEMOSTRATION OF THE ONE-STEP VOTING PROCESS SOON. THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY NEWSPAPERS, BROCASTING, TV TALK SHOWS, ELECTRONIC NEWS THAT ARE CONTROLLED BY VARIOUS SPECIAL INTERESTS GROUPS THAT YOU SHOULD NOT TRUST WHAT YOU READ OR HEAR. I WOULD COMPARE INFORMATION FROM BOTH SIDES AND OTHER RELIABLE SOURCE TO CONSTRUCT MY OWN CONCLUSION.
Dear 麻煩你寫繁體中文 -2
I THINK YOU HAVE BEEN GETTING THE DISTORTED INFORMATION FROM THE WRONG SOURCES, ONE-SIDED. CEC IS NOT OWNED OR CONTROLLED BY DPP; RATHER, IT IS AN INDEPENDENT AGENCY, CONSISTING OF MEMBERS FROM PAN-GREEN, PAN-BLUE, AND OTHERS. IN FACT, THERE ARE MORE PRO-PAN-BLUE MEMBERS THAN THOSE WHO SIDE WITH PAN-GREEN.
CHINA HAS THE VETO RIGHTS BUT AS I SAID IN THE EARLIER POSTING “IT’S NOT GOING TO BE EASY, BUT IT IS AN ATTAINABLE GOAL AS LONG AS WE HAVE THE PEOPLE AND THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY ON OUR SIDE.” IF WE GATHER ENOUGH INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT, CHINA WILL HAVE TO GIVE IN. RECOGNIZING IT IS A LONG SHOT, WE CANNOT GIVE UP HOPE. GOD HELPS THOSE WHO HELP THEMSELVES.
I am sorry that I don’t have繁體中文 ON MY PC AT THIS TIME.
Dear 麻煩你寫繁體中文 -3
OH, ONE CLARIFICATION ABOUT [ PRESEDENT CHEN HAD SAID " NO THING WILL HAPPEN AFTER ELECTION" ] – IT HAS BEEN TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT AND PURPOSELY SKEWED TO MISLEAD THE PUBLIC. WHAT PRESIDENT A-BIAN SAID IS THAT AFTER THE ELECTION (WITH UN FOR TAIWAN REFERENDUM), NOTHING WILL HAPPEN TO TAIWAN --> CHINA WILL NOT ATTACK TAIWAN AS WHAT PAN-BLUE HAD CLAIMED THE CONSEQUENCE OF ADMINSTERING THE “UN FOR TAIWAN: REFERENDUM WOULD BE.
To Dear 請停止政爭 - 1
I was not able to vote for 2004 election/referendum, but I can assure you that I was totally in tune with what was going on in Taiwan all the time, before and after the election. I would have voted Yes for the referendum, not so much for the content itself but just to show my support for the rights to vote for referendum – as a way to dispute KMT’s claim that the referendum is illegal and that the referendum should not be conducted together with presidential election. They made every effort to deprive Taiwanese the constitutional rights and to poison and brainwash the Taiwanese that referendum is something evil, dirty, sinister, and unlawful. Our young democracy needs tender-loving care to grow and mature. People need to learn to be the master, managing the public servants, telling the politicians what they really want, not the other way around.
To Dear 請停止政爭 - 3
The drive Of “UN for Taiwan” and the promotion of economic affairs can go hand-in-hand; they are not mutually exclusive. I don’t understand why some people insist that the two tasks are conflicting effort. In a normal country and under normal conditions, as long as the government plans and executes the appropriate economic policies and as long as the people work hard, keeping up the productivities, nothing will go terrible wrong. However, Taiwan right now is not a normal country – it is deeply divided, in half, with both parties pulling Taiwan into opposite direction: independent vs. (being) unified. Because of this vital difference, the economic growth and stability are scarified as part of the power-fetching games. Tell me, how can you focus on the economic affair without addressing the root cause of it all – the national identify difference? Will KMT start collaborating with DPP on the important policies impacting people’s everyday life, instead of pulling the legs, burning the bridges, and tearing down the pillars? Or you just want to open one eye and close the other, thinking everything will just work out fine as long as DPP focuses on nothing but economic affairs?
不管甚麼階段
拉倒亂台賣台
配合中共軍演(支那香港明報)
似圖在台製造動亂的
引支那東南艦隊(在台東外海威脅軍演)
突擊台灣的
支那外來政權
國匪名黨就對了
Taiwan for UN
To: 麻煩你寫繁體中文
I have never felt any desire to promote 'ROC for UN'
because it was ‘名不正言不顺‘ The 'Taiwan for UN' activities has really made a difference this year. The whole world now started to realize how ridiculous it is to not let Taiwan be part of the UN. The fact that China has the Veto right to exclude Taiwan from UN has made the whole thing even funnier.
你們阿扁說要思考戒嚴,停選,當選無效,這根本就是反民主的帝制思想,
台灣人民打拚為民主三百年,才有的一點成果,被你們昏扁,幾年就敗光,可惜啊,可惜!
版主為何不敢批扁?扁的作為是扁的,不要把所有綠的全掃下髒水.
各位藍軍朋友，你們什麼時候看過那個朝代政治不好經濟會好的？所以請你們不要再愚弄選民，大家都知道經濟要做好，但是你們整天再想要怎樣政黨輪替怎樣把政府攪亂，這樣對嗎？民進黨如果做的不好自然就會被淘汰，你們那麼急嗎？原來你們還考慮到你們在大陸投資的金錢物力是否拿得回來？真悲哀的國民黨，被大陸共產黨趕過來台灣，現在還要脫光光回去見爹娘，真悲哀！悲戚！哀戚
綠軍趕快與阿扁切割吧,不然,立委掉到四十席以下,大敗之日只餘四十多天了.
to 看不下去人
It’s quite amusing that somehow you were able to connect 戒嚴, 停選, 當選無效 TO 帝制. MAYBE MY UNDERSTANDING OF 帝制 DIFFERS FROM THAT OF YOURS. UNDER帝制, THERE IS NO凍蒜 nor走路工; THE OFFICIALS ARE APPOINTED, NOT ELECTED BY POPULAR VOTES. 帝制 IS “JIANG KAI-SHEIK 萬歲”; 民主IS “台灣萬歲”. YOU PROBABLY FORGET THAT “OUR” PRESIDENT A-BIAN IS ONE OF THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS AND WAS IMPRISONED FOR HIS INVOLVEMENT IN THE PURSUE OF A DEMOCRATIC TAIWAN. WHY IS IT ALWAYS A-BIAN’S FAULT? WHEN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DEFIANTLY REFUSED TO CARRY OUT A MUCH IMPROVED, STANDARDIZED NATIONAL VOTING PROCEDURE AND REFUSED TO BUDGE, WHAT IS YOUR MITIGATION PLAN? WHO ARE AT FAULT? WHO ARE VIOLATING THE LAW? WHO ARE STUMPING OUR YOUNG DEMOCRACY? AS THE HEAD OF THE NATION, RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SAFETY OF THE PEOPLE, OF COURSE A-BIAN SHOULD BE LOOKING INTO ALL POSSIBLE OPTIONS, EVALUATING THE PROS AND CONS, AND COMING UP WITH THE BEST POSSIBLE RESOLUTION. NOW TRY TO BE FAIR AND BE LOGICAL. 我也看不下去了.
To VICKI
你的兩套標準實難服人
陳水扁當台北市長衝突中央你說他是Freedom Fighter
現在台北市長衝突中央你說他VIOLATING THE LAW? STUMPING OUR YOUNG DEMOCRACY？ 阿扁自己也說二階段公投讓他勝選 藍軍要二階段公投 他就要戒嚴? 阿扁可做別人為何不能?你為何如此偏坦阿扁
以下都是阿扁自己說的 不是藍軍編造
-------------------------------------
Ｉ陳水扁在當台北市長時曾說中央應該尊重地方，
怎麼現在為了要作票而不尊重地方??
例：1994.12.04(當選市長)：台北市事事看中央眼色的做法將成為歷史。
1995.07.26(市長任內)：市府無意與中央爭權，但為了落實地方自治精神，促進行政效率及便民福祉，地方政府的自主空間應擴大。
1999.12.23(競選總統)：如果民進黨贏得二千年總統大選，一定會做到100%地方自治。
2001.12.17(總統任內)：地方與中央是夥伴關係，中央應打破集權集錢的心態。
就是要政黨輪替
民進黨如果做的不好自然就會被淘汰?
不政黨輪替怎麼淘汰?請教你
我不是藍軍 若你硬要說我是
表示你無話可說惱羞成怒喔 哈哈
To VICKI
臺灣現在的情形 It is really A-Bian's 阿扁fault
I think you are not living in taiwan for long time or maybe you had your benefit if DPP win.
I watched and listened what A-Bian did and said after I voted to him. However I found he was not a freedom fighter but really a clever 政客. He always did things for his most befefit but not for people.
I think he is not good as 蔣經國.
A-Bian insulted his people
叫幫他繳稅付他薪水的人民跳海滾蛋
Whom did you paid you tax to? American or Taiwan?
如果你是替American繳稅 The president of American 叫你跳海滾蛋? How did you do ? And why could you teach the people in Taiwan how to do if you didn't pay tax in Taiwan?
If you really pay tax in Taiwan, The president of Taiwan 叫你跳海滾蛋 when you said something affend to him? How did you think ? However everyone in Taiwan especially paid tax in Taiwan had the right to choose what they want and what they do不要被阿扁的愛臺灣绑架了 ,
愛臺灣不等於愛阿扁
看來,輪替淘汰民進黨的時候到了,
什麼理由也不能為扁解釋,
罷免陳水扁，不給他戒嚴政變的機會，讓他皇帝當不成。
樓上的,政變？政誰的變？省省力氣吧!明年五月就下台了!
留點力氣~等馬英九當選~我們再一起將他罷免!拉他下來!
你講~按ㄋ好不好啊! (最後一句請用台語)
樓上的阿米
等等馬英九當選
就要監督司法 讓扁坐牢 為他禍國殃民付出代價
你講~按ㄋ好不好啊! (最後一句請用台語)
給作者
作者你說馬英九清廉??? 那特別費被起訴時未何要趕緊把1400多萬特別費捐出去??? 錢不能花嗎?? 別人的特別費是拿發票去申請, 他馬的是直接匯入帳戶,再補發票. 他哈佛畢業的, 還當過法務部長, 不知道這是違法??? 那當初未為何叫陳水扁下台, 不然會死的很難看??? 國務機要費跟特別費的性質哪裡不同了??? 有勞你解釋了???
真奇怪
一階段,兩階段有什麼問題嗎??? 不是中央選舉委員會的權責嗎?? 憑什麼其他人有那麼多意見?? 那要中選會幹麻?? 各地方辦自治選舉嗎???
他馬的
一堆白癡, 那麼愛賣台的國民黨, 等到國民黨執政了, 開放大陸人可以來台工作了, 看看你還找得到工作才奇怪, 月薪$10000元大陸人就搶著幹了! 被共產黨統一後, 終身俸和18%??? 一率比照祖國大陸公務人員待遇, 不幹早點滾, 大陸下崗等著幹的多的是! 臺灣人連雞都沒得當吧...
他馬的
也不必爭了, 等國民黨贏了, 兩岸統一就不遠了, 到時候, 就沒有選舉了啦, 只剩共產黨啦 , 還吵個屁!!!
台灣人
統一之後, 各縣市首長也甭選, 通通由祖國派任; 立委更慘, 通通失業, 爽不爽???
to 56 我也看不下去了- 1
I consider an individual who risks his career and his own life fighting for a good cause, under the martial law, against an absolute authoritarian ruler and its killing machine a Freedom Fighter. The time: when A-bian was a relatively unknown young lawyer, not when he was the mayor of Taipei. Your hero, Mayor 郝龍斌, on the other hand, living comfortably under the protection shield of the freedom and democracy made possible by many of the true Freedom Fighters like A-bian, is free to challenge 中央 AND THE ELECTED PRESIDENT, WITHOUT FEAR OF BEING DRAGGED OUT OF THE BED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT, BRUTALLY PERCECUTED, AND DUMPPED INTO THE DARK DITCHES. Mayor 郝 is not fighting for something that lifts Taiwan to a higher ground. Rather, his showbiz-style defiance against中央IS CLEARLY A SETBACK TO OUR DEMOCRACTIC SYSTEM, SERVING NONE BUT his and his party’s own interests. In his eyes, he is above the “law and order.” And…you would qualify him as a Freedom Fighter??? Please, give me a break.
to 56 我也看不下去了- 2
中央應該尊重地方 OF COURSE, AS LONG AS BOTH SIDES STAY WITHIN THE BOUNDARY SET BY THE LAW. YOUR MAYOR 郝 is trying to break the law. That’s a big deal.
市府無意與中央爭權，但為了落實地方自治精神，促進行政效率及便民福祉，地方政府的自主空間應擴大 IT MEANS THAT UNDER THE OLD DICTATORSHIP AND MARSHAL LAW, 中央集權集錢 AND NOW 中央 WILL HAVE TO RELINQUISH SOME OF THE POWER BACK TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT. EXCELLENT RECOMMENDATION.
如果民進黨贏得二千年總統大選，一定會做到100%地方自治 – DITTO (EXCELLENT)
地方與中央是夥伴關係，中央應打破集權集錢的心態 – DITTO (EXCELLENT)
A-bian has all the right ideas. How can you deny that?
To 58 It is really A-Bian's fault
Let’s be rational. You just can’t blame A-Bian for anything that goes wrong. We are now living in a democratic political system, not under the authoritarian dictatorship any more; there is check-and-balance – the elected president is, a lot of times, powerless. You should also ask what the high-paid legislators have accomplished in the last 7 years. What have the opposition parties done to paralyze our system, our society, and our economy? And what have you done? Please try to look at the bigger picture before you point fingers to one particular person for everything – small or big.
I am merely a poor student working part-time to support myself. I have nothing to do with DPP or A-bean; I just have a big heart for my beloved motherland Taiwan. I hope pan-blue friends would do the same - cherish the land that has harbored them for the past six decades, and treasure the freedom and democracy that billions of people in other countries can only hope for in their dreams.
To 65 他馬的
Very well said - direct and to the point.
給,65,72,
大錯,錯,中選會是扁任命的,聽扁命行事而已,不是客觀中立機關,
依兩位標準,未來如藍的執政,中選會,國家通訊傳播委員會,等等,全都由馬任命,也聽藍的亂搞,屆時諸位可要比照大力支持才行哦.
說個小故事
話說當兵品來做個2年小包頭存了一些錢，想說開個店當當老板癮，朋友介紹開電動間最好，那時賭博電動會捉，我去賣電玩的看，賣電玩的老闆介紹一種水果盤的電玩，我對他說非法的我不要，他拍胸脯對我說這個一定合法，上還有公文，上面寫的此電玩經本廰認定為非賭博性電玩，純屬娛樂機台。台灣省教育廰。我想這個都有公文了我們進了４０台，沒多久警察來捉，好在我２０台電源沒開，結果被抬走２０台，還給你一張３萬的罰單，我當然不服，我抗告，去高雄簡法庭，被排最後一個，等法官審理到我時，就把門關上，他先問我學歷，問完時他說，你高中學歷，那我問你教育部大還是教育廰大，我就說廢話當然教育部大，他說ＯＫ我拿教育部公文給你看，它上頭寫著，只要電動玩具上有分數數字顯示皆屬於賭博性電玩，那你說合不合法，此時我內心只有一句話，我咧幹依娘中華民國法律。
中選會目前是半黑機關,沒有組織法,中選會委員任命也沒有經過立法院同意,
黃石城當年不聽扁的,張政雄唯扁命是從,風骨有無之別,如是而已
中選會是黑機關?
笑死人鳥
全世界都知道
支那國匪黨及支那黨控制的立法院
是全世界最黑的機關
不必鬼扯
回去支那吧
to 76 wqq
黃石城當年不聽扁的,張政雄唯扁命是從,風骨有無之別,如是而已==> this is called the process "streamlining" or "re-engineering": cumbersome multiple-ballots, multiple-step -> multiple-ballot, one-step -> eventually computerzied one-ballot, one-step
Now who has the brain and the common sense? 張政雄 is the clear winner. when a better process is implemented, the voters win and all Taiwanese win too. What separate DPP from KMT? DPP never ceases to reform, to push Taiwan forward.
原來你是學生啊
原來你是學生啊 看你滿嘴英文 還以為是那Post Doctor or PI
學生總是理想大於現實 當年解嚴520 野百合 不知你出生了嗎
我可都參加過 那時也是臺灣黃金時代大陸是沒得比 曾幾何時唉
當年黨外人士是有很多Freedom Fighter 如黃信介施明德等真正勇士阿扁是撿現成前人的果實的俗辣 就像他現在想撿現成中華民國的便宜
自立台灣國一樣 哪個國家開國不是浴血奮戰 所以說他是聰明政客
AFTER THE ELECTION (WITH UN FOR TAIWAN REFERENDUM), NOTHING WILL HAPPEN TO TAIWAN --> CHINA WILL NOT ATTACK TAIWAN 是你自己想的吧 一旦戰爭你在國外也威脅不了你
是學生才有這種Free time打筆戰
奉勸好好念書或有個一計之長為上策 現在博士失業也不少 若還要到對岸求職就更難堪了
PS: I am not student and now I am doing my research in
the top institute in US. However, I am afraid that I was only one from Taiwan but more than 100 people from China in the same building.I don't agree with you but I
hadn't your free time.
To 79 doing research in us -2
我可都參加過當年解嚴520 野百合? IS THAT RIGHT?
是學生才有這種FREE TIME打筆戰 ACTUALLY I DON’T. UNLIKE SOME “PROFESSIONAL STUDENTS” IN THE PAST WHO GOT PAID TO WRITE ARTICLES AND PUBLISH MAGAZINES AND WHOSE TUITIONS/ROOM/BOARD WERE PAID FOR BY A GRANT (中山SCHOLARSHIPS) FROM THE “PARTY=NATION”, I HAVE TO WORK PART-TIME TO SURVIVE. I AM WRITING TO EXPRESS MY OPINION AND MY LOVE AND HOPE FOR TAIWAN.
若還要到對岸求職就更難堪了 TOTALLY AGREE. CHINA IS NOT A PLACE FOR THE HIGHLY EDUCATED TAIWANESE WISHING TO LAND A GOOD JOB. DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY MILLIONS OF COLLEGE GRADUATES THAT ARE LEFT UNEMPLOYEED IN CHINA? HOW MANY MORE MILLIONS ARE HOMELESS OR LIVING UNDER EXTREME POVERTY? LOOK IT UP.
To 79 doing research in us -3
China is enjoying a rapid economic growth, thanks to the globalization and outsourcing from the developed countries, especially Taiwan (in my opinion, the investment is way out of proportion). I am happy for the Chinese people and wish them the best because they still have a long, long way to go to become a great country. As for Taiwan, it is still in pretty good shape even though the pro-pan-blue media paints the picture in gray and blue. I remain confident in the competitiveness and the creativity of the Taiwanese people.
YOU WROTE “HOWEVER, I AM AFRAID THAT I WAS ONLY ONE FROM TAIWAN” WHAT’S WRONG WITH THAT? THE MORE THE BETTER? SHOULDN’T JAPANESE OR FRENCH BE CRYING THEIR HEARTS OUT? IF YOU STILL INSIST THAT THERE ARE SO MANY CHINESE AND NOT ENOUGH TAIWANESE STAYING IN USA IS A TERRIBLE AND HUMILIATING MATTER, TRY TO LOOK AT IT IN %/POPULATION. NOW, FEEL BETTER?
To 79 doing research in us -4
一旦戰爭你在國外也威脅不了你 # 1: TOO MUCH IS AT STAKE FOR TOO MANY BIG PLAYERS (INCLUDING CHINA ITSELF) FOR THE WAR TO HAPPEN. # 2: ALL MY FAMILY MEMBERS ARE IN TAIWAN, NOT TO MENTION MY OTHER RELATIVES, FRIENDS, AND FELLOW TAIWANESE. AGAIN, UNLIKE THE PAN-BLUE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AND MOST OF THE PAN-BLUE high RANKING OFFICIERS WHOSE SONS, DAUGHTERS, BROTHERS, SISTERS, AND ASSETS ARE WELL SETTLED IN USA, CHINA, SWISS, ETC., TAIWAN IS MY HOME. I WILL BE THERE.
你在中華民國下長大
不可否認的,台灣國尚未成立,若說臺灣國存在過, 那是丘逢甲古人時代
若你生在臺灣,長在臺灣 ,不是小留學生, 那就是中華民國政府環境下長大, 中華民國政府使用納稅人(包括你的父母及你們所謂的外省人)的錢, 讓你受義務教育, 使用公共建設(蘇花中橫十大建設 電力水力), 你的老師以及阿扁拿的獎學金都來自中華民國政府納稅人(包括你的父母及你們所謂的外省人), 中華民國府這四個字未虧待過你, 你長大後不喜歡中華民國這四個字喜歡臺灣這名稱那都是個人自由,但為了名稱, 你有什麼權力要趕對建立臺灣國沒興趣的人走啊, 逼人跳海,畢竟他們有曾貢獻這土地,好歹你們有使用過中華民國納稅人(你的父母及你們所謂的外省人)的稅錢蓋公共建設, 是誰付與你這種權力
名分有這麼重要 和平快樂生活在這島上比較重要吧
我支持從前民進黨爭取人民民主自由,但不能認同他們說是為臺灣實是為了政權,撕裂臺灣,挑起對立的做法更遑論他們治國能力不佳
You are growing under 中華民國 ( Alias:Taiwan)
你說你樂見中國強大, I AM HAPPY FOR THE CHINESE PEOPLE AND WISH THEM THE BEST BECAUSE THEY STILL HAVE A LONG, LONG WAY TO GO TO BECOME A GREAT COUNTRY.) 那你為何不以同樣寬大胸襟對待從未虧待你的中華民國及它的人民呢, 樂見它強大,一定要將它趕盡殺絕呢 難道說你與中國的關係比較好.
若你有小孩(無論是非親生)在你打造的環境下長大, 長大後對你說 我不喜歡你們的名字請你離開 ,你覺得合理嗎? 你不喜歡有本事去外面創業建立新家啊
PS除了環保議題 政治人物說為下一代如何聽聽就好(如果你有下一代because you said if war TAIWAN IS MY HOME. I WILL BE THERE ) 下一代要做臺灣人 美國人甚至是中國人跟你留學一樣要選擇臺灣,美國,甚至是中國, 那都是個人自由, 你控制不了的;我只能說一個國家越富強願意當它的國民就越多
The hot topic among Chinese in US now especially for China is its successful space mission (landing on the moon), they said China is becoming s strong country. However I saw the hot topic in Taiwan is how to win the election and get the political power although Taiwan is becoming weaker than before. . That is what I am afraid of.
And that is why I take my time.
匪類就是匪類,戒嚴統治反民主,反民主就是匪類
為這片土地盡心力 不論它的名稱是什麼
各位曾經想過"臺灣"這兩個字來源
為什麼讓長期同住一個島的人互相仇恨對立
有好幾個版本 看你選擇哪一個
但我想最重要讓所有人民和平相處為這土地盡心力不論它的名稱是甚麼是
我肯定中華民國對臺灣人民的貢獻 也承認台灣人民是"中華民國"得以續存的恩人 這是互惠共榮的作法
畢竟中華民國存在是事實你有也承認 但有人又更喜歡臺灣這個名字
to 84,85,87 HAPPY BEING AN INTERNATIONAL ORPHAN 中華民國
I HAVE MANY GOOD 外省人FRIENDS WHO LOVE THE LAND, THE PEOPLE, AND CONSIDERED THEMSELVES THE TAIWANESE. THEY ARE MY FELLOW COMPATRIOTS. YOUR “中華民國” IS AN ANCIENT HISTORY, A COUNTRY THAT IS NO MORE, A NAME THAT HAS LOST ITS MEANING, AND A SYMBOL THAT IS NO LONGER RECOGNIZABLE INTERNATIONALLY. 蔣’S REFUSAL TO PUT中華民國TO REST HAS COSTED US DEARLY, LEAVING US THE UNFORTUNATE ORPHAN STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE OUT IN THE COLD. I AM SADDENED BY THE FACT THAT THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO THINK 名分IS NOT IMPORTANT. YOUR CHILD RAISING EXAMPLE IS INAPPROPRIATE WHEN USED TO DESCRIBE OUR ISSUES WITH NATIONAL IDENTITY AND STATEHOOD.
IT IS A MIRACLE THAT YOU COULD DRAW SUCH A CONCLUSION FROM MY GENTLE COMMENT FOR CHINA:“那你為何不以同樣寬大胸襟對待從未虧待你的中華民國及它的人民呢, 樂見它強大,一定要將它趕盡殺絕呢 難道說你與中國的關係比較好.” I AM SPEECHLESS.
to 84,85,87 HAPPY BEING AN INTERNATIONAL ORPHAN 中華民國 -2
I FURTHER SHAKE MY HEAD WHEN I YOU’RE YOUR COMMENT: “中華民國政府使用納稅人(包括你的父母及你們所謂的外省人)的錢, 讓你 .…中華民國府這四個字未虧待過你,…” IT’S THE TAXPAYERS (ESPECIALLY MY HARD-WORKING PARENTS) THAT SUPPORT THE 中華民國政府 AND SUPPORT MY EDUCATION. I DON’T WANT TO GET INTO TAXATION AND OTHER SOCIAL PROGRAMS. THERE IS JUST TOO MUCH INJUSTICE THAT NEEDS TO BE UNDONE.
CHINA IS MAKING PROGRESS ECONOMICALLY, BENEFITTING FROM A RUSH FOR GLOBALIZATION AND AN INTERST IN ITS PATHETICALLY LOW LABOR COST. HOWEVER, WITHOUT A FUNDAMENTAL POLITICAL REFORM, CHINA WILL NEVER BECOME A GREAT COUNTRY. YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT WHILE YOU DROOL AND ENVY OVER CHINA’S RISING WEALTH AND ARE WILLING TO BECOME A CHINESE JUST BECAUSE OF IT, NEARLY ALL OF THE CHINESE STUDENTS STUDYING IN USA ARE TRYING THEIR BEST TO STAY AND BECOME US CITIZENS. ASK YOURSELF WHY? REALLY, YOU SHOULD BE PROUD THAT THERE IS A HOT TOPIC OF HOW TO WIN THE ELECTION IN TAIWAN. ENJOY YOUR FREEDOM AND THE RIGHTS TO VOTE. I APPRECIATE YOUR TAKING TIME TO COMMENT ON MY POSTING. HOWEVER, IT IS APPARENT THAT WE ARE THINKING AND LOOKING AT THINGS AT ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LEVELS.
not INTERNATIONAL ORPHAN if Taiwan
Let history be history. IT is meaningless that if 蔣怎樣怎樣,Taiwan will .... Because we must face the truth "reality " If yOUR “中華民國” IS AN ANCIENT HISTORY, A COUNTRY THAT IS NO MORE, what we are because Taiwan country hasn't established. your saying let me remember the story"國王的新衣"
IT’S THE TAXPAYERS (ESPECIALLY MY HARD-WORKING PARENTS) THAT SUPPORT THE 中華民國政府 AND SUPPORT MY EDUCATION. I DON’T WANT TO GET INTO TAXATION AND OTHER SOCIAL PROGRAMS. THERE IS JUST TOO MUCH INJUSTICE THAT NEEDS TO BE UNDONE. 真是不負責任的話 你不願繳稅因為你覺的不公平卻已使用了別人的稅款 you ＨＡＤ HARD-WORKING PARENTS 難道別人沒有 是我誤會嗎 但英文是這樣
I am glad if you didn't mean the following statement
but your hero A-bain did
那你為何不以同樣寬大胸襟對待從未虧待你的中華民國及它的人民呢, 樂見它強大,一定要將它趕盡殺絕呢 難道說你與中國的關係比較好.”
THINK 名分IS NOT IMPORTANT.
THE FACT THAT THERE ARE STILL PEOPLE LIKE YOU WHO THINK 名分IS NOT IMPORTANT. I can post some of them. You can look it up directly "http://blog.yam.com/straitpeace/article/12749610"
國號會搞的亂七八糟的你不會不知道是誰搞出來的吧!?
不管是什麼國號. 你就是生在這片土地上...國號...很重要嗎?
那陳先生的兒子是不是要順便改名字呢? 把中字改成台字也不錯
真搞不懂到底是人民生活富足安康重要還是國號喊的對重要?
台灣是我們這個島的名字也是籍貫 中華民國是國號
你是哪裡人? 是台灣人也是中華民國的人...
要講的話就是中華民國人 籍貫台灣 那麼簡單也會怕你小孩問錯嗎?
要正名 還不是有人壓根心理有問題 硬要跟別人一樣在位就要新國號
新商品 新鈔票 新名字 淨更換一些有的沒的 政績呢?
是有政績啦......政績不三不四 還在搞民族意識
----------------------------------------------------
你不要你的孩子不知道自己國家的名字是台灣，沒有錯，我想，每一個人都有一個心中的理想家園及理想國號
但無論如何 請學會尊重及包容，天下沒有「順我者生逆我者亡」的道理，畢竟我們同在一艘船，可能會在台灣某一處擦身而過
你有你堅定信仰，我有我的自身理想，但請用同樣的心中尺寸去衡量當政者的對與錯，用客觀去判斷政策的正確與否
國號叫中華民國就是對？改台灣共和國就是亂？天下哪有這種道理，那是歷史宿命論產物，泛藍乾脆主張叫大漢帝國或大漢民國好了
悲哀
台灣自從民進黨執政以來就已經沒有法律了 因為國民黨就代表法律代表法官 凡事都人家說了就算嗎? 民進黨在執政個屁呀 到底是哪個黨在執政我還真搞不清楚了呢? 政黨輪替後就天天都是萬聖節耶~不給糖吃就搗蛋 睜眼說瞎話臉不紅氣不喘 騙騙那些沒智慧的百姓倒還可以啦
思想決定行動,選票才是行動,但是,在非綠即藍,非藍即綠下,你的思想不被左右,但是政策卻被別人左右了
什麼？說要思考戒嚴的是阿扁，但為什麼正港台灣之子，民主到A錢都是轉型正義的說要戒嚴卻要去問KMT？